Skip to main content

Grading Mathieu Darche's volatile first years as NY Islanders General Manager

Nov 22, 2025; Elmont, New York, USA; New York Islanders General Manager Mathieu Darche speaks with fans at a pre-game event prior to the game against the St. Louis Blues at UBS Arena. Mandatory Credit: Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images
Nov 22, 2025; Elmont, New York, USA; New York Islanders General Manager Mathieu Darche speaks with fans at a pre-game event prior to the game against the St. Louis Blues at UBS Arena. Mandatory Credit: Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images | Wendell Cruz-Imagn Images

Grading a first-year general manager is never clean. Context matters. Timing matters. And as Matt O'Leary and Mitch Anderson from Up The Turnpike put it, it’s “important to really go through and dissect the big moves” when evaluating early decisions.

For Mathieu Darche, that means a mixed report card defined by bold swings, uneven execution, and long-term questions. Matt and Mitch, former Eyes on Isles editors, graded each of the trades as posted on their Up The Turnpike YouTube channel.

They started with the headline move: the Noah Dobson trade.

Darche flipped a premium talent for Emil Heinman and two first-round picks that became high-upside prospects. Critics acknowledged “you’re giving up the better player today,” but justified it as a future play built on depth and cost control. If those picks hit, this deal could age into a clear win—or at worst, a rare “win-win” for both sides.

Then comes the drop-off.

The Carson Soucy acquisition was widely viewed as a miss. Even with logical intent—replacing injured depth—the result was blunt: “a net negative.” In a vacuum, a third-round pick isn’t crippling, but process without payoff still earns a low grade.

Worse was the Ondrej Palat deal. This wasn’t just ineffective—it was avoidable. Analysts were emphatic: “straight F.” Taking on term and salary for a declining player who “was a ghost” offensively compounded the error. Even factoring in cap flexibility, the move failed to deliver value.

The most polarizing decision came at the deadline: acquiring Brayden Schenn. On one hand, he added toughness and produced at a respectable pace. On the other, the concerns are structural. At 35 with term remaining, Schenn represents exactly what the Islanders have tried to move away from—aging, top-six congestion, but then added “another old veteran clogging up your top six”.

That tension defines Darche’s first year. Vision versus execution. Future assets versus present inefficiencies. The Dobson trade suggests a clear plan. The others suggest a front office still calibrating.

The final grade? Incomplete—but trending volatile.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations