A voice mail was sent in on the latest episode of the Tri-State Hockey Podcast, and the question was as bold as it was inevitable: if Anders Lee isn’t re-signed, should Matthew Schaefer become the next captain of the New York Islanders?
The caller made a compelling case, or at least tried his best to do so. “Before you say he’s too young,” the voicemail argued, “look at the five youngest captains in NHL history—McDavid, Landeskog, Crosby, Lecavalier, Toews. All of those guys worked out.” The logic is hard to ignore. If elite talent and maturity can accelerate leadership, why not Schaefer? From the outside, his poise, rapid development, and ability to handle pressure suggest he could shoulder the responsibility.
But former NHLer Mike Rupp didn’t hesitate to shut that down—and emphatically.
“That would singularly be the dumbest move they could do right now,” Rupp said bluntly. Not because Schaefer isn’t capable long term—but because timing matters more than potential. “Not that he won’t—he ultimately will and should be the captain—but why rush a thing?”
"Should the #Isles name Matthew Schaefer captain?"
— Daily Faceoff (@DailyFaceoff) May 1, 2026
A simple "wrong" would have done just fine @Rupper17! 😂
+ much more on the #NHLPlayoffs & the draft lottery on Ep. 45 of the Tri-State Hockey Podcast.@JLazzy23 | @StapeNHL
Presented by @bet365ca #bet365… pic.twitter.com/FXZPoFMLmc
Rupp’s argument centers on developmental pacing. Schaefer has already had “the whole world thrown at him,” and by all accounts, he’s handled it exceptionally well. But that’s exactly why the Islanders should resist the urge to accelerate things further.
“Let him go at this pace,” Rupp emphasized. “Everything’s been expedited with this kid, and he’s handled it perfectly. Don’t mess that up.”
There’s also a roster reality check. The Islanders are not a rebuilding team desperate for identity. “You’re not a team that’s lacking veterans,” Rupp noted. “You don’t need to force that he’s the guy everybody looks up to right now.”
In other words, Schaefer may be the future face of the franchise—but forcing that future into the present could do more harm than good. Leadership, like development, isn’t just about who—it’s about when.
